Connect with us

Sports

Final Four predictions: Does UConn have this in the bag?

Published

on


Members of one of the most unlikely quartets in recent college basketball history will fight to win a national championship in the days ahead.

Sure, most of the sports world expected UConn to return to this stage a year after a national title run, even though some of the stars from that team are gone. But Donovan Clingan, Stephon Castle and Tristen Newton are also up against history: There hasn’t been a back-to-back champion in 17 years, and the past five national champions didn’t even get past the first weekend.

NC State wasn’t even in the projected field when the conference tournaments began. DJ Burns Jr. & Co. had to win the ACC tournament and mimic the 1983 national title-winning Wolfpack to get to this stage — a run that followed a 2-7 stretch at the end of the regular season. Purdue had to overcome the disappointment of last year’s loss to Fairleigh Dickinson, the greatest upset in NCAA tournament history, to get Matt Painter to his first Final Four appearance. And Alabama — a basketball school now? — developed the best offense in America to earn the program’s first trip to the Final Four.

Every remaining team has a compelling story. But who will leave Glendale, Arizona, with the crown?

As we begin the final weekend of the 2023-24 season, ESPN’s Jeff Borzello, John Gasaway, Joe Lunardi and Myron Medcalf discuss the tournament and the teams left standing — and make their predictions for another evening of blockbuster national semifinal games.

SCHEDULE:

No. 11 seed NC State Wolfpack vs. No. 1 seed Purdue Boilermakers: Saturday, April 6, 6:09 p.m. ET

No. 4 seed Alabama Crimson Tide vs. No. 1 seed UConn Huskies: Saturday, April 6, 8:49 p.m. ET

Joe Lunardi: It’s not fair to UConn, but this tournament won’t likely be remembered fondly if the Huskies continue steamrolling the field. On the other hand, if UConn and Purdue give us an epic championship game, that will be the lasting memory of a great month. Either that or NC State giving the full Jimmy V experience on Monday night. Something extraordinary needs to happen in the Final Four to lift this year’s tourney beyond the level of “very good.”

Jeff Borzello: The perfect NCAA tournament for me is one that has several first-round upsets, one or two double-digit seeds in the Sweet 16 and powerhouse matchups in the later rounds. This year’s edition has come pretty close to ticking all the boxes. UConn and Purdue are still standing, all four 1s and 2s reached the second weekend, NC State has provided Cinderella magic and we had the likes of Oakland and Yale win in the first round. I’m a fan.

Myron Medcalf: I’ve loved this one because I think it has offered everything we enjoy about the NCAA tournament. Players from nondescript schools and stars from Power 5 powerhouses alike have all watched their profiles grow over the past two weeks. Zach Edey is a bigger star after leading Purdue to the Final Four. Jack Gohlke was the most popular player in the first round after Oakland’s upset over Kentucky. DJ Burns Jr. is a household name. So is Donovan Clingan. The NCAA tournament is at its best when it can produce a diverse set of heroes. This edition has done that.

John Gasaway: Sign me up for five or 10 more of these. We had the wacky first-weekend surprises, but we also got all four No. 1 seeds through to the Sweet 16 for the first time since 2019. Now here we are at the Final Four with two teams that were expected to be here (though some were wary about Purdue after last year) and two “surprises.” Well, Alabama beat the top two seeds in its region to get here, and NC State brushed aside a Duke team that toppled 1-seed Houston. No one’s moaning about any team’s “easy” path. I’m on Team 2024.

Borzello: It’s the big man Final Four! A potential national championship showdown between Zach Edey and Donovan Clingan is mouthwatering to consider, while DJ Burns Jr. has arguably been the breakout star so far. All three are dominant in different ways, too. Edey does it offensively, Clingan does it defensively, Burns does it in his own unorthodox way. And of course, then there’s Alabama and its fast-paced, 3-point-happy style to counter the low-post dominance across the rest of the bracket.

Medcalf: I think UConn’s pursuit of history is the theme this weekend. Most national champions haven’t earned opportunities like this one. Can anyone stop them? Remember, they’re also not the first Final Four squad to arrive with an aura of invincibility. The 1998-99 Duke team had won 32 games in a row entering the national title game against UConn. That team lost. In 2015, Kentucky was 38-0 entering a Final Four matchup against Wisconsin. That team lost, too. The Huskies seem unbeatable, but we’ve watched teams in their situation miss the mark before.

Lunardi: No one is beating UConn. What separates the Huskies from the group of unsuccessful “inevitable” champions is their single-mindedness. Dan Hurley may be painful to watch at times, but his team is a perfect manifestation of a relentless will to win. I find him to be the most fascinating character in the tournament, the car accident we can’t ignore. And he will find every necessary enemy — from Edey to the NCAA travel office — to motivate himself and his team to win another title.

Gasaway: UConn has given us the gift of “no matter what” history. If the Huskies repeat? History. At the other extreme, losing to Alabama would be epic on the level of prohibitive favorite UNLV losing to Duke in the 1991 national semifinals. A loss to, say, Purdue in the title game? History! On the same level as the Blue Devils losing to (oh, the irony!) fellow top seed Huskies in the 1999 title game. Multiply the previous sentence times 10 in case of a Monday night defeat at the hands of NC State. This is big.

Lunardi: This should be a double-digit win for the Boilermakers. Even if you were to believe Edey and Burns are a wash (which they are not), Purdue is better at every other spot. This is also NC State’s longest layoff for quite some time, leading us to wonder if the magic dust might be gone. The Wolfpack lost four straight and seven of nine at the end of the regular season for a reason. I’ll be shocked if Purdue isn’t playing Monday night.

Score prediction: Purdue 78, NC State 65

Gasaway: No player at this Final Four claims a more impressive list of defensive victims than Burns. During NC State’s miraculous run across both the ACC and NCAA tournaments, the senior has scored on a who’s who of defenders from Duke (twice), Virginia, North Carolina, Texas Tech and Marquette. He’ll get his points, but opponents doing so hasn’t really been a worry for Edey and Purdue. The Boilermakers are as good as it gets when it comes to second chances. NC State’s defensive rebounding has held up surprisingly well the past four games, but Edey is a different challenge.

Score prediction: Purdue 77, NC State 70

Medcalf: I don’t know if any team in the country has an answer for Edey. The bigger question: How many fouls does NC State have to give? Because the Wolfpack will foul Edey as they try to guard him. Burns could create problems for Edey with his passing and his ability to play in space — although Tennessee committed 55 fouls against Purdue over two games this season. Early foul trouble is a greater focus for NC State than neutralizing the best player in America.

Score prediction: Purdue 80, NC State 71

Borzello: Burns will be a unique matchup for Edey, given his ability to pass out of double-teams and knock down face-up jumpers from the midrange or baseline areas. But I’m not sure defending the 7-foot-4 Edey with Burns and Mohamed Diarra, two 6-9 players who have dealt with foul trouble all tournament, is necessarily a solution. I’m not going to fully count out the Wolfpack, given the ride they’ve been on the past three weeks, but I think this game against Purdue is where it comes to an end for Kevin Keatts’ crew.

Score prediction: Purdue 74, NC State 66

Borzello: There’s a case to be made Alabama’s tempo and ability to attack or make shots from all five positions pose a different challenge than UConn has seen so far in this tournament. And the Crimson Tide have the ability to make 15-plus 3s in a game — a scary proposition. But Stephon Castle has already shut down Boo Buie and Terrence Shannon Jr., and he could do the same with Mark Sears. Meanwhile, Alabama’s fast-paced style could play right into UConn’s hands.

Score prediction: UConn 89, Alabama 76

Lunardi: It doesn’t matter if UConn shuts down Alabama (although I expect it will happen to some degree). What matters is whether Alabama can shut down UConn, and that’s not happening. Since losing to Auburn 99-81 on Feb. 7, the Crimson Tide have allowed 90.4 points per game over 14 contests. If they allow 90 points against UConn, they’re going to get crushed.

Score prediction: UConn 92, Alabama 75

Gasaway: Alabama shoots as many 3s as a familiar Big East opponent for UConn (Creighton) but at a faster pace and, for many minutes, from a true five-out look. Not to mention the thing that makes the Crimson Tide truly different is that they really don’t care if they miss their first 10. They’ll keep firing away. The problem for Nate Oats is that the matchup between his defense and the Huskies’ offense appears, at least on paper, to be decidedly one-sided in UConn’s favor.

Score prediction: UConn 88, Alabama 75

Medcalf: Alabama has connected on 41.4% of its 3s in the NCAA tournament. If it can play fast and hit shots from the perimeter, theoretically, it can compete. Thing is, playing fast approach hasn’t worked for anyone against UConn. In their three losses this season, the Huskies played at a slower pace: 60 possessions (Kansas), 62 possessions (Seton Hall) and 59 possessions (Creighton). The four teams that pushed Connecticut to 70 or more all lost. Increasing the tempo isn’t a great solution against the Huskies.

Score prediction: UConn 95, Alabama 80

Borzello: The easy answer is Zach Edey, since he’s averaging 30.0 points and 16.3 rebounds through four NCAA tournament games. But I’ll go outside the box and pick Alex Karaban. UConn vs. Alabama feels like a game that will be played primarily in transition, and Karaban seems to always find a way to effectively trail the play or fade out to the wing for a 3 on the break. And he’s lethal when he’s shooting in rhythm. He started to get going in the second half against Illinois, and it feels like a true breakout game is coming.

Lunardi: The second-best player at the Final Four. In what figures to be a high-paced, high-scoring affair, UConn’s Tristen Newton might go for a triple-double against Alabama. Newton hasn’t really had a breakout game in the tournament, but I like his chances against the defenseless Tide. With triple-doubles already this year against Manhattan and Villanova, why not one more on the biggest stage possible?

Medcalf: I’ll go with Fletcher Loyer. NC State will have to throw everything it has at Edey, and that will open the floor for Loyer, who has made 46% of his 3-point attempts in the NCAA tournament. While nothing seemed to fall from beyond the arc for the Boilermakers against Tennessee in the Elite Eight, Loyer should get an abundance of open looks on Saturday night, I think.

Gasaway: Let’s be bold: Michael O’Connell. His performance may not be enough to topple mighty Purdue and its outstanding Edey-centric offense, but good things can happen for guards who draw Matt Painter’s second or even third preference for backcourt defense. The Boilermakers will have their hands full with Burns and DJ Horne. O’Connell will benefit accordingly.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

آپ کا ای میل ایڈریس شائع نہیں کیا جائے گا۔ ضروری خانوں کو * سے نشان زد کیا گیا ہے

Sports

Revised schedule of Pakistan vs England Test series announced

Published

on

By


Players from the Pakistan and England teams during a match. — AFP/File

KARACHI: Pakistan’s cricket board on Friday announced a revised schedule for a series it will hold against England next month, ending weeks of uncertainty including reports it could be moved abroad.

The first two Tests will be held back-to-back in Multan and the last in Rawalpindi, skipping Karachi where ongoing construction at the National Stadium has forced the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) to tweak the schedule.

“The series will start in Multan with the first Test from October 7-11 and the second Test — originally scheduled for Karachi — has been shifted to Multan, as the stadium in Karachi is undergoing (a) major facelift for next year’s Champions Trophy,” said a statement from the PCB.

The second Test will start from October 15, while the third in Rawalpindi will be staged from October 24.

The England men’s cricket team will arrive in Multan on October 2 for their second tour of Pakistan in two years.

The announcement ended weeks of frustrating wait by the England and Wales Cricket Board who were seeking clarity on the schedule.

Moreover, there were media reports of shifting the series to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) where Pakistan was forced to play its home matches from 2010 to 2019.

Revised schedule:

7-11 Oct – First Test, Multan

15-19 Oct – Second Test, Multan 2

4-28 Oct – Third Test, Rawalpindi

Continue Reading

Sports

ICC delegation satisfied over Champions Trophy 2025 preparations

Published

on

By


The grand National Bank Stadium, previously known as National Stadium Karachi, pictured before a Pakistan Super League (PSL) match between Peshawar Zalmi and Multan Sultans on March 13, 2020 in Karachi, Pakistan. — AFP

ISLAMABAD: A delegation of the International Cricket Council (ICC) met Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Chairman Mohsin Naqvi and discussed arrangements made for the ICC Champions Trophy to be held in the country next year. 

The ICC envoy expressed satisfaction in Karachi and Rawalpindi for the preparations ahead of the tournament. 

The delegation was also satisfied with the security arrangements and protocols in Karachi, Rawalpindi and Islamabad. 

A detailed discussion on security arrangements for the tournament also took place in the meeting, said a press release.

The ICC delegation included ICC Senior Manager Events Sarah Edgar, Event Manager and Champions Trophy Event Lead Aun Muhammad Zaidi, General Manager Cricket ICC Wasim Khan, Security Manager David Musker and Broadcast consultant Mansoor Manj.

From the PCB, Director International Cricket Usman Wahla, Director Security Colonel (retired) Khalid Mehmood, and Head of Marketing Salman Mesud attended the meeting.

PCB Chairman Naqvi assured the ICC delegation of world-class arrangements for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025.

He further said that the upgradation work of the stadiums will be completed well before the tournament, and foolproof security arrangements will be made for all participating teams.

“Hosting the ICC Champions Trophy in Pakistan is an honour, and preparations are being finalised to match the grandeur of the tournament,” the cricketing body chairman stated.

Naqvi assured the ICC that all teams participating will enjoy playing in a peaceful and secure environment.

“After the upgradation, the stadiums will be equipped with international-standard facilities, enhancing the spectators’ experience,” Naqvi added regarding the work at the stadiums that will host the mega event next year.

“The Pakistani nation has a deep love for cricket and will support all teams during the mega event in February and March next year,” Naqvi concluded. 

Continue Reading

Sports

South Africa inflict 2-1 defeat over Pakistan in women’s T20I series

Published

on

By


South African women team players pictured during the third T20I against Pakistan in Multan on September 20, 2024. — Facebook/PakistanCricketBoard

South Africa women on Friday triumphed over Pakistan in the third T20I to secure a 2-1 victory against the Green Shirts in the three-match series.

The visitors, during the match at Multan Cricket Stadium, bagged a convincing win over the national side by chasing down the 154-run target in 18.3 overs while only losing two wickets.

Opener Laura Wolvaardt (45) and Annerie Dercksen (44*) starred for the Proteas with Anneke Bosch also pitching in 46 runs before getting retired hurt.

Suné Luus scored 14* runs whereas opener Tazmin Brits failed to score after being stumped on the very first ball she faced.

For Pakistan Sadia Iqbal and Tuba Hassan bagged one wicket each.

Earlier in the day, winning the toss, South Africa chose to bowl first and restricted the national side to 153 for five.

Batting first, Sidra Ameen emerged as the highest run-scorer for the Green Shirts with her 37-run knock. Meanwhile, Muneeba Ali and skipper Fatima Sana scored 33 and 27 runs, respectively.

Chloe Tryon, Tumi Sekhukhune, Nonkululeko Mlaba and Luus and dismissed one batter each for the visitors.

South Africa’s Luus was awarded the Player of the series while Dercksen was named Player of the match for their key contribution in the series and the last match, respectively.

Continue Reading

Sports

Sources: ACC, Clemson, FSU renew revenue talks

Published

on

By


Talks between Clemson, Florida State and the ACC have ramped up in recent weeks, according to sources, on a proposal that would allot a greater share of revenue to schools based on brand valuation and television ratings, as well as potentially alter the expiration of the league’s grant of rights — which currently runs through 2036 — in exchange for the Tigers and Seminoles dropping their lawsuits against the conference.

According to multiple sources within the league, the conversations are preliminary and the sides are not close to an agreement, but the conversations represent a strong signal that Florida State and Clemson are open to remaining in the conference under more favorable financial terms.

The proposal, which was formulated by Clemson and Florida State and discussed by the league’s presidents during Tuesday’s regularly scheduled meeting, includes additional money going to schools with better ratings success in football and basketball.

While the proposal has not been widely distributed or discussed among conference athletic directors, administrators from more than a half-dozen schools who spoke with ESPN said they would at least be open to some altered revenue split.

In 2022-23, the ACC distributed an average of $44.8 million per school, roughly $7 million less than the SEC; however, that difference is expected to grow to more than $30 million when accounting for the SEC’s new television contract, which began this year.

Florida State athletic director Michael Alford has called the forthcoming revenue gap an existential threat, and he pushed for the ACC to divide revenue unequally during the league’s 2023 spring meetings, asking for more money to go to schools that had success on the field as well as those that drew the highest ratings for television. The league ultimately agreed to institute a new revenue-sharing policy dubbed “success initiatives” that would reward programs that made bowl games, the College Football Playoff or the NCAA men’s and women’s basketball tournament with a higher share of postseason revenue, but at the time, ADs were not interested in any plan that included brand valuation or television ratings, too.

In the months that followed, however, Florida State and Clemson filed lawsuits against the ACC in an effort to extricate themselves from the league’s grant of rights, which binds each member’s media rights to the ACC through June 2036. The ACC countersued both parties in North Carolina. To date, little movement has occurred on the legal front, and should the cases go to trial, a final resolution to the lawsuits could still be years away, according to attorneys for all sides. As part of a judge’s ruling in Leon County, Florida, the sides were required to enter into mediation, which is when discussions about ratings-based revenue splits took on new life.

Within the proposal put forth by Clemson and Florida State, the term of the grant of rights would also be reduced — potentially as early as 2030 — to better fall in line with the expiration of TV deals in the Big 12 and Big Ten.

While the basic talking points of the proposal had some support within member schools, there were significant questions about the details. As one athletic director who supported the general idea noted, properly evaluating something like TV ratings can be difficult with numerous outside factors influencing kickoff times, networks and ratings share that may not directly reflect a program’s value.

Several administrators who did not support the proposal did admit there was a potential incentive to continue discussions if it helped insure the future of the conference for the foreseeable future, with one noting that it would be better than seeing the ACC fall apart completely and another suggesting a brand-based revenue split could be inevitable for every league as TV contracts continue to grow and leagues continue to expand.

The ACC is also in talks with ESPN, which holds an exclusive option to extend the league’s television contract from 2027 through 2036. ESPN must pick up or decline the option by February 2025.

The ACC declined to comment on the status of discussions on changes to the revenue distribution model, but in May, commissioner Jim Phillips said he was open to all options that would secure the league’s standing.

“You have to stay optimistic,” Phillips said, “and you work through these things. We’ll manage what we have to manage, and I’m always optimistic about a really good ending out of this situation. I won’t have a change until somebody else tells me different. But am I going to fight for the ACC? Absolutely. That’s my responsibility.”

Continue Reading

Trending