Prince Harry’s recent set of engagements are “dangerous” because he risks aggravating the Royal Family, according to royal biographer Angela Levin.

Speaking on GB News, Levin joined Nana Akua to discuss the duke’s travels in recent days without his wife, Meghan Markle, by his side.

He was recently seen in Lesotho, South Africa, carrying out charity work and meeting royalty.

But the trip is ill-advised, Levin said, as she went about criticising the duke’s recent exploits.

“His eight solo engagements in nine days on his own is a very interesting thing”, she said.

“He’s gone to all these charities he used to work with as a working royal and I think it’s a way to say, ‘I don’t need the Royal Family, I can do this on my own and I can do this much better because everyone still loves me’.

“I think that is a very dangerous thing to do. I think the Royal Family will come up with something because they can’t have this. It’s appalling.”

Nana Akua then put it to Levin that Harry was in Africa carrying out important charity work, and therefore it’s unfair to criticise.

“He wasn’t there for very long”, she snapped back.

“Also, he tells us all how he doesn’t like the paparazzi and press, he was loving it out there.

“I don’t believe that for a second.”

The prince travelled to South Africa to perform duties with his Sentebale charity, which he co-founded in 2006.

The Office of Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex took to their Sussex.com website to update its readers on the trip.

They issued a statement which read: “Today marked a significant moment as Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex – or Mohale, as he’s affectionately known by the Basotho people – commenced his trip to Lesotho, warmly welcomed by The King and Queen in a private meeting.

“This occasion not only rekindled cherished connections from his childhood but also celebrated a remarkable milestone: the 200th anniversary of the nation.

“The Duke holds a special place in his heart for this nation, particularly through his work with Sentebale, the organisation he co-founded alongside Prince Seeiso in 2006 to support vulnerable children in Southern Africa.

“His commitment to the region is deeply rooted in a shared vision for sustainable development and empowerment.”

Folie à Deux reveals the Joker’s true identity in its “brutal ending,” leaving audiences questioning everything they thought they knew. 

Identity confusion is a central theme of the film, and the conclusion of this sequel may come as a surprise to many fans.

Director Todd Phillips returns with Joaquin Phoenix, who reprises his iconic role as Arthur Fleck, a man spiraling deeper into mental illness. 

The film opens with Arthur behind bars in Arkham Asylum, anxiously awaiting his trial for the murders he committed two years earlier. 

During his time in prison, he revels in his celebrity status among fellow inmates and even the guards, including a sadistic Irishman played by Brendan Gleeson, who rewards Arthur with cigarettes in exchange for his jokes.

Lady Gaga steps into the shoes of Harleen ‘Lee’ Quinzel, a fellow inmate who’s on the path to becoming the infamous Harley Quinn in the highly anticipated sequel to Joker. 

Arthur’s lawyer, played by Catherine Keener, attempts to argue that the charges against him involve his alter ego, the Joker, who is implicated in five murders. Y

Arthur renounces his Joker identity, only to be found guilty of first-degree murder.

As he faces sentencing, a car bomb explodes outside the courthouse, orchestrated by two mysterious figures who aid in his escape. 

However, his freedom is short-lived as the police apprehend him and return him to Arkham Asylum.

In a haunting final scene, a young patient approaches Arthur, ready to share a joke. But instead, he stabs Arthur in the stomach, carving a smile into his own face as Arthur bleeds out. 

This chilling moment leaves viewers questioning the true identity of the Joker: could it be that Arthur never fully embraced his villainous persona? Instead, he may merely be the catalyst for the man who eventually becomes the legendary Joker.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may be facing a potential crisis as speculation mounts around a “pot of gold” that could lead to a revealing memoir about their time as senior royals. 

Simon Case, who recently announced his departure as head of Britain’s civil service after four years, previously served as Prince William’s private secretary starting in July 2018.

Ephraim Hardcastle’s column for the Daily Mail has ignited rumors that Case might pen a book detailing his experiences working with the Royal Family, particularly the behind-the-scenes drama during Meghan and Harry’s decision to step back from royal duties.

Although it’s reported that he signed a non-disclosure agreement, it’s suggested that this may only pertain to his time with William, potentially leaving him free to write about the Sussexes.

Hardcastle noted, “While all courtiers are expected to be sphinx-like, Case could succumb to the pot of literary gold at the end of the royal rainbow,” raising concerns for Harry and Meghan as they navigate this unexpected turn of events.

This speculation arises as reports surface that Meghan Markle, who officially joined the Royal Family in May 2018 after her marriage to Prince Harry in Windsor, is considering writing a memoir of her own. 

As the narrative around the Sussexes continues to unfold, her potential book could add another layer to the ongoing discussions surrounding their time in the royal spotlight.

 The prospect of both a memoir from Meghan and the potential revelations from Simon Case creates an intriguing—and perhaps precarious—situation for the couple as they navigate their post-royal lives.

Whenever King Charles travels for official engagements and tours, he carries an unusual item—on his doctor’s orders.

Later this month, King Charles and Queen Camilla are set to embark on a journey to Australia and Samoa. Alongside his personal belongings, the King will bring a surprising essential—a supply of blood. He is also always accompanied by a doctor.

In 2016, the Telegraph’s Gordon Rayner reported that the late Queen would also travel with a Royal Navy doctor, who would research local hospitals whenever she embarked on international tours.

“In countries where a reliable blood supply is questionable, the Queen and the Prince of Wales both travel with their own personal packs of blood following in their convoy wherever they go,” he added. 

“Their doctor is never more than a few paces away, carrying a bulky medical bag containing a mobile defibrillator and all manner of emergency medicine.”

While the King’s travel list is extensive, there is one thing he doesn’t have to worry about packing – and that’s his passport. 

According to the royal family’s website , which has yet to be updated in full following the death of Queen Elizabeth, the British monarch does not need a passport for a simple reason – the documents are issued in their name.

“When travelling overseas, The Queen does not require a British passport,” it explains. “As a British passport is issued in the name of Her Majesty, it is unnecessary for The Queen to possess one. All other members of the Royal Family, including The Duke of Edinburgh [then Prince Philip ] and The Prince of Wales [then Prince Charles], have passports.”

It means that although Queen Elizabeth II travelled over one million miles and visited over 100 countries during her record-breaking reign, she never brought along the identification document. 

In 2023, the first passports bearing King Charles’s name were issued following the death of his mother in September 2022. Home Secretary Suella Braverman commented on the significance of the change in a statement confirming the news.

“For 70 years, Her Majesty has appeared on British passports and many of us will not remember a time when she did not feature. Today marks a significant moment in U.K. history, as the first British passports since 1952 start featuring the title of His Majesty the King,” Braverman said.

The new navy passports are stamped with the Royal Arms just as before, but language on the first page has been tweaked from ‘Her Majesty’ to ‘His Majesty’.

“His Britannic Majesty’s Secretary of State requests and requires in the name of His Majesty all those whom it may concern to allow the bearer to pass freely without let or hindrance, and to afford the bearer such assistance and protection as may be necessary,” it states.